欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 1032-1041.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202603.026

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于PCA的林场火险等级区划影响因子选取

孙术发1*,姜山1,杨旭1,赵鹏2,张暄1,胡新宇1   

  1. 1东北林业大学土木与交通学院, 哈尔滨 150040; 2黑龙江省林业和草原调查规划设计院, 哈尔滨 150040)

  • 出版日期:2026-03-10 发布日期:2026-09-01

Selection of influencing factors for forest farm fire risk level zoning based on PCA.

SUN Shufa1*, JIANG Shan1, YANG Xu1, ZHAO Peng2, ZHANG Xuan1, HU Xinyu1   

  1. (1School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; 2Heilongjiang Forestry and Grassland Survey, Planning and Design Institute, Harbin 150040, China).

  • Online:2026-03-10 Published:2026-09-01

摘要: 森林火灾因其频发性和不可预测性,对森林生态安全和区域可持续发展构成了严重威胁。科学合理地划定火险等级区,已成为提升灾害防控能力的核心举措。本研究以黑龙江省黑河市七二七林场为对象,收集该林场的矢量数据、遥感数据,并将其归纳为地形因素、植被因素、气候因素和人文因素四大类,共计34个森林火灾影响因子。运用ArcGIS 10.8软件中主成分分析(PCA)功能,对影响因子进行分析。并基于分析结果中主成分贡献率以及主成分因子荷载矩阵,选取15个内部关联程度小、但与火灾因素关联性最强的因子。借助Super Decision 3.0软件构建因子网络模型确定因子权重。在此基础上采用加权叠加评价法对森林火险等级进行综合评估,最终根据自然断点法分为高火险、中高火险、中火险、中低火险、低火险5种火险等级区域,各占研究区比例15.1%、29.3%、24.5%、18.9%、12.2%。通过历史火情数据对区划结果进行验证,结果显示历史火点分布与火险等级高度一致。与传统层次分析法进行叠加对比,证实PCA在火险因子选取后进行叠加的可靠性和有效性。本研究成果可为林场的早期林火预警、扑灭资源规划和分配工作提供科学依据,对提升林场森林火灾防控能力和保障森林资源安全具有重要意义。


关键词: 森林火险等级, 主成分分析, 网络层次分析, 加权叠加, 七二七林场

Abstract: Forest fires, due to their frequent occurrence and unpredictability, pose a severe threat to forest ecological security and regional sustainable development. Scientific and rational delineation of fire risk grade zones has become a core way to enhance disaster prevention and control capabilities. Taking the Qierqi Forest Farm in Heihe City, Heilongjiang Province as the research object, we collected vector data and remote sensing data of the forest farm. We classified all the 34 forest fire-influencing factors into four categories: topographic factors, vegetation factors, climatic factors, and human factors. The principal component analysis (PCA) function in ArcGIS 10.8 software was used to conduct analysis of the influencing factors. Based on the principal component contribution rate and the principal component factor loading matrix in the analysis results, 15 factors with low internal correlation but strong correlation with fire factors were selected. The Super Decision 3.0 software was used to construct a factor network model to determine the factor weights. On this basis, the weighted superposition evaluation method was used to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the forest fire risk level. According to the natural break point method, the forest fire risk level was divided into five grades: high, medium-high, medium, medium-low, and low, accounting for 15.1%, 29.3%, 24.5%, 18.9%, and 12.2% of the study area, respectively. The zoning results were verified by historical fire data. The results showed that the distribution of historical fire points was highly consistent with the fire risk levels. By superimposing and comparing with the traditional analytic hierarchy process, the reliability and effectiveness of PCA in superimposing after the selection of fire risk factors were confirmed. Our results can provide scientific basis for the early warning of forest fires, the planning and allocation of fire-fighting resources in the forest farm, which is of great significance for improving the forest fire prevention and control capabilities of the forest farm and ensuring the safety of forest resources.


Key words: forest fire risk level, principal component analysis, analytic network process, weighted superposition, Qierqi Forest Farm