Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 1633-1641.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.030

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Ecological vulnerability assessment on Changbai Mountain National Nature Reserve and its surrounding areas, Northeast China.

ZHU Qi1,2, ZHOU Wang-ming1, JIA Xiang3, ZHOU Li1, YU Da-pao1, DAI Li-min1*   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3Changbai Mountain Academy of Sciences, Erdaobaihe 133613, Jilin, China
  • Received:2019-02-11 Revised:2019-02-11 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2018YFC0507305).

Abstract: Exploring the ecological vulnerability of nature reserve and its surrounding area is essential to the maintenance of regional ecological security and sustainability of human development, especially under the stress of global change and human activities. Based on the integration of "sensitivity-resilience-pressure" conceptual model and spatial principal component analysis (SPCA), we analyzed the ecological vulnerability of Changbai Mountain National Nature Reserve and its surrounding 30 km buffer in 2005 and 2015. The main driving factors were further analyzed. The results showed that the ecological vulnerability of Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve was mainly potential, slight, and light levels in 2005 and 2015, indicating the ecological vulnerability inside and outside the reserve was in a good condition. For the whole region, the ecological vulnerability showed a slight downward trend from 2005 to 2015. The degradation area inside and outside the reserve were 254 and 967 km2, respectively, with the contribution rate to the increase of overall vulnerability being 30.8% and 69.2%, respectively. The changes in ecological vulnerability inside the reserve were mainly related to the changes in net primary production (NPP), vegetation coverage, and the nearest distance to the road, whereas it was mainly related to the changes in NPP, vegetation coverage and gross domestic product (GDP) density outside the reserve.