海伦撂荒地植物生物量的季节变化

应用生态学报 ›› 2002, Vol. ›› Issue (6): 685-688.

海伦撂荒地植物生物量的季节变化

于永强, 宇万太, 张璐

中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究, 沈阳 110016

收稿日期:2001-03-27 修回日期:2001-07-10 出版日期:2002-06-15
通讯作者: 宇万太
基金资助:
国家重点基础发展规划项目(NKBRSF,G1999011804);国家重大基金资助项目(39899370)

Seasonal fluctuation of plant biomass in land remained bare in Hailun experimental station

YU Yongqiang, YU Wantai, ZHANG Lu

Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016

Received:2001-03-27 Revised:2001-07-10 Online:2002-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对海伦20年和7年撂荒地的地上生物量和地下生物量,以及农田地上生物量和地下生物量的田间定位调查和实验室分析对比研究结果表明,随着农田撂荒时间的延长,植被生物量(根生物量和地上生物量之和)具有明显增加趋势;地上生物量之间的差异不显著,而根生物量的差异达到显著水平,表明不同撂荒年限样地的生物量差异主要体现在根生物量上.撂荒时间越长,生态系统抵抗环境胁迫的能力越强,生态系统越稳定,根生物量的周转值越小,表明生态系统具有更加稳定地供应养分和能量的能力.

关键词: 生物量, 周转值, 撂荒地

Abstract: Analysis of the above-and under-ground biomass of the land remained bare for seven years and twenty years and the farmland in Hailun experimental station showed that total biomass increased over the bare period. There was no significant difference in above-ground biomass between bare lands,while the root biomass showed obvious difference,indicating that total biomass was differed mainly from root biomass between bare lands. With longer bare period,the ecosystem had the stronger resistance to environmental stress and the more stability. Meanwhile,its root biomass turnover value was small,which suggesting the higher ability to supply nutrient and energy stably.

Key words: Biomass, Turnover value, Land remained bare

中图分类号:

S154.4

于永强, 宇万太, 张璐. 海伦撂荒地植物生物量的季节变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, (6): 685-688.

YU Yongqiang, YU Wantai, ZHANG Lu . Seasonal fluctuation of plant biomass in land remained bare in Hailun experimental station[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, (6): 685-688.

参考文献

[1] Chen Q-Q(陈庆强),et al.1998.Advances in the research of the soil's carbon cycle.Adv Earth Sci(地球科学进展),13(6):555～563(in Chinese)
[2] Chen Z-Z(陈佐忠),Huang D-H(黄德华).1988.The below-ground biomass and turnover of the Aneurolepidium chinense and Stipa grandis steppe in the Xilin river basin.Res Grassl Ecosys(草原生态系统),2:132～137(in Chinese)
[3] Dong M(董鸣) eds.1996.Survey,Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocommunities.Beijing: China Standard Press.73～75(in Chinese)
[4] Huang J-H(黄建辉),Han X-G(韩兴国),Chen L-Z(陈灵芝).1999.Advances in the research of (fine) root biomass in forest ecosystem.Acta Ecol Sin(生态学报),19(2):270～277(in Chinese)
[5] Jenkinson DS.1988.Soil organic matter and its dynamics.In:John W eds.Russel's Soil Conditions and Plant Growth.London: Longman.564～607
[6] Liu G-S(刘光崧) eds.1996.Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis & Description of Soil Profiles.Beijing: China Standard Press.123～125(in Chinese)
[7] Li Z-P(李忠佩),Wang X-J(王效举).1998.Simulation of soil organic carbon dynamic after changing landuse pattern in hilly red soil region.Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报),9(4):365～370(in Chinese)
[8] Santatonio D,Grace JC.1987.Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomass and decomposition time: A compartment-flow model.Can J For Res,17(6):900～908
[9] Shen S-M(沈善敏)eds.1998.Chinese Soil Fertile.Beijing: China Agricultural Press.111～124(in Chinese)
[10] Wang R-Z(王仁忠).1997.Biomass formation dynamics of Leymus chinensis population affected by grazing.Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报),8(5):505～509(in Chinese)
[11] Wang S-Q(王绍强),Chen Y-F(陈育峰).1998.The research and trend of the carbon cycle model in the surface of earth.Prog Geog(地理科学进展),17(4):64～72(in Chinese)
[12] Xi C-F(席承藩) eds.1998.Chinese Soil.Beijing: China Agricultural Press.318～336(in Chinese)
[13] Zeng Z-S(曾昭顺),Shen S-M(沈善敏),et al.1980.The current condition and adjuestment ways in the chinese agricultural ecosystem of the black zone.Chin J Soil Sci(土壤通报),(2):15～20(in Chinese)

[1]	苑淑媛, 张鹏, 沈海龙. 天然更新红松苗针叶光合和解剖特性对不同郁闭环境的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2314-2320.
[2]	代泽成, 刘月秀, 党宁, 王志瑞, 蔡江平, 张玉革, 宋永波, 李慧, 姜勇. 长期氮水添加对温带草原土壤化学性质和微生物学特性的短期遗留效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1834-1844.
[3]	吕晶花, 赵旭燕, 陆梅, 李聪, 杨志东, 刘攀, 陈志明, 冯峻. 氮沉降下纳帕海草甸植被与土壤变化对微生物生物量碳氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1525-1532.
[4]	吕付泽, 杨雅丽, 鲍雪莲, 张常仁, 郑甜甜, 何红波, 张旭东, 解宏图. 免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土微生物群落及其残留物的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 903-912.
[5]	豆梦珂, 张伟东, 杨庆朋, 陈龙池, 刘晔嘉, 胡亚林. 杉木种植和磷添加对土壤微生物生物量及胞外酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 631-638.
[6]	高羽, 谢龙飞, 郝元朔, 董利虎. 考虑随机效应的长白落叶松立木生物量模型构建及精度分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 333-341.
[7]	于鑫磊, 苑俊风, 刘冬伟, 陈金辉, 闫巧玲. 野外土壤增温对胡桃楸幼苗生长和生理特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 11-17.
[8]	肖向前, 张海阔, 冯娅斯, 王吉鹏, 梁辰飞, 陈有超, 朱高荻, 蔡延江. 植物残体对青藏高原高寒草甸土壤、微生物和胞外酶C∶N∶P化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 58-66.
[9]	邓亚琴, 徐智, 张勇, 王宇蕴. 土壤微生物生物量氮对不同腐熟度有机肥的响应及对土壤矿质氮的调控作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 137-144.
[10]	马靖然, 王亚楠, 常璐, 邓娇娇, 周旺明, 于大炮, 王庆伟. 冠层光谱组成对红松和蒙古栎幼苗生长和光合荧光特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2314-2320.
[11]	谢龙飞, 李凤日, 董利虎. 基于贝叶斯似乎不相关回归方法的天然蒙古栎生物量模型构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1937-1947.
[12]	汪亚芳, 刘宗悦, 张宝刚, 余树全, 蔡延江. 入侵毛竹皆伐对亚热带森林土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1233-1239.
[13]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 苏世锋, 董怡玲. 调控措施对祁连山中度退化高寒草甸土壤的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 988-994.
[14]	武开阔, 张哲, 武志杰, 冯良山, 宫平, 白伟, 冯晨, 张丽莉. 不同秸秆还田量和氮肥配施对玉米田土壤CO₂排放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 664-670.
[15]	李佳乐, 梁泳怡, 刘文杰, 杨秋, 徐文娴, 汤水荣, 王晶晶. 有机肥替代化学氮肥对橡胶幼苗生长和土壤环境的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 431-438.