欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3303-3310.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202010.035

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

陇东地区金翅雀的巢址选择

马龙1,2,柏军鹏1,2,路瑞1,3,张佩琪1,常慧1,李莲吉1,史红全1*   

  1. (1陇东学院生命科学与技术学院, 甘肃庆阳 745000;2南昌大学生命科学学院, 南昌 330031;3兰州大学生命科学学院, 兰州 730000)
  • 出版日期:2020-10-10 发布日期:2021-04-09

Nest-site selection of Grey-capped Greenfinch in East Gansu, China.

MA Long1,2, BAI Jun-peng1,2, LU Rui1,3, ZHANG Pei-qi1, CHANG Hui1, LI Lian-ji1, SHI Hong-quan1*   

  1. (1College of Life Science and Technology, Longdong University, Qingyang 745000, Gansu, China; 2School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; 3School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China).
  • Online:2020-10-10 Published:2021-04-09

摘要: 为探究金翅雀(Chloris sinica)营巢是否偏好某些树种以及偏好原因,于2017—2019年4—8月,在陇东学院校园内,开展了金翅雀巢址选择调查。180个金翅雀巢址分析显示:金翅雀营巢利用圆柏(Juniperus chinensis)、刺柏(Juniperus formosana)、侧柏(Platycladus orientalis)、日本晚樱(Cerasus serrulata)等17种乔木,其中圆柏(χ2=13.6, df=1, P=0.000)和刺柏(χ2=9.8, df=1, P=0.002)是金翅雀选择的主要树种;与其他巢址比较,圆柏和刺柏巢址的巢树树冠直径(DNTC)、巢缘距(DEC)和巢树最近树距离(DT)显著小于其他树种巢址的相应参数,而圆柏和刺柏巢址的巢树树冠高度(HNTC)、巢冠底距离(DBC)、巢树草地距离(DM)、可利用林木数量(NT)和隐蔽度(CC)都显著大于其他树种巢址的相应参数(T或Mann-Whiteny U检验,全部P<0.05);差异显著的8个巢址参数(DNTC、DEC、DT、HNTC、DBC、DM、NT和CC)的因子分析表明,环境隐蔽性、巢位隐蔽性和巢位不易接近性是导致金翅雀偏好在圆柏和刺柏上营巢的主要因素。本研究结果可为城市环境绿化中如何保护鸟类提供参考。

关键词: 金翅雀, 巢址选择, 树种, 隐蔽性

Abstract: To explore whether Grey-capped Greenfinch (Chloris sinica)prefer to nest in certain tree species and the potential reasons for the preference, we examined the nest-site selection of Grey-capped Greenfinch in the campus of Longdong University from April to August, 2017-2019. The results showed that: (1) A total of 17 tree species were used by Grey-capped Greenfinch for nesting, including Juniperus chinensis, J. formosana, Platycladus orientalis and Cerasus serrulata.Among those species, J. chinensis (χ2=13.6, df=1, P=0.000) andJ. formosana (χ2=9.8, df=1,P=0.002) were the main species chosen by the birds through analysis of 180 nestsites. (2) Some parameters of the preferred tree species, including diameter of nest tree canopy (DNTC), distance from the nest to canopy edge (DEC), distance from the nest tree to the nearest tree (DT), were significantly smaller than those of other species. Other parameters of the preferred tree species, including height of the nest tree canopy (HNTC), distance from the nest to the bottom edge of canopy (DBC), distance from the nest tree to the nearest meadow (DM), number of available trees (NT), concealment degree (CC), were significantly greater than those of the other tree species (Tor MannWhiteny U test, all P<0.05). (3) A factorial analysis of the eight nest-site parameters with significant differences (DNTC, DEC, DT, HNTC, DBC, DM, NT and CC) indicated that environmental concealment, nest location concealment, and nest location inaccessibility were the main factors driving the preference of Grey-capped Greenfinches to nest in J. chinensisand J. formosana (explained 63.7% pf the variation). Our results can provide a reference for how to protect birds in urban greening.

Key words: Grey-capped Greenfinch, nest-site selection, tree species, concealment.