欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

哈尔滨城市森林遮荫和降温增湿效应差异及其影响因素

张波1,王文杰1,2*,何兴元2,周伟1,2,肖路1,吕海亮2,魏晨辉2#br#   

  1. (1东北林业大学森林植物生态学教育部重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150040; 2中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 长春 130102)
  • 出版日期:2017-04-10 发布日期:2017-04-10

Shading, cooling and humidifying effects of urban forests in Harbin City and possible association with various factors.

ZHANG Bo1, WANG Wen-jie1,2*, HE Xing-yuan2, ZHOU Wei1,2, XIAO Lu1, LV Hai-liang2, WEI Chen-hui2#br#   

  1. (1 Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; 2 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China).
  • Online:2017-04-10 Published:2017-04-10

摘要: 在哈尔滨市内选取4种不同林型(单位附属林、道路林、风景游憩林和生态公益林)共183块样地,通过实地测量样地内主要树种的测树因子和样地内外环境因子,定量研究了不同林型在遮荫、降温、增湿效应的差异及其与外界环境、树木生长特征之间的关系。结果表明:城市森林遮荫、增湿效应程度分别为77%~90%、3%~6%;水平降温约3 ℃、土壤降温1~2 ℃;而垂直降温多表现为冠层温度低于林内温度1 ℃以内;4种不同林型遮荫、降温、增湿效应差异显著,总效益综合得分显示风景游憩林比其他3种林分平均高19%;城市森林遮荫、降温、增湿等生态服务功能在高温、晴朗和低湿环境下更强;树高、枝下高、冠幅和胸径对树木遮荫、降温增湿效果有显著影响,且多表现为高大树木具有更明显的生态服务功能;不同城市森林类型具有明显的微气候调节相关生态服务功能差异,对于风景游憩林应继续维持其高生态服务功能,对于环境调节能力较低的森林类型应加强管理。

关键词: 西北地区, 时空分布, 稳定同位素, 大气降水线, 云下蒸发效应

Abstract: In this paper, a total of 183 plots distributed in Harbin urban region were selected, and 4 different forest types (affiliated forests, AF; roadside forests, RF; landscape forests, LF and ecological welfare forests, EF) were classified, and tree growthrelated parameters and environmental factors (inside and outside the forest) were measured simultaneously. The aims of this study were to find differences between the 4 forests types in shading, cooling and humidifying effects and their associations with the environmental and tree growth characteristics. We found that urban forests produced a 77%-90% reduction of sun lights (shading effect) and a 3%-6% increase in relative humidity (humidifying effect). The forests had a horizontal cooling effect of around 3 ℃ lower than open sites (outside forests). Soil cooling effect was 1-2 ℃ lower under canopy than in outside forests. The vertical cooling effect characterized as canopy temperature about 1 ℃ lower than under canopy temperature. Shading, cooling and humidifying effects significantly differed among the four forest types. The comprehensive scores for all these microclimate regulations demonstrated that LF was 19% higher than the other three forest types on average. Urban forests had much stronger regulating functions at high air temperature, low air humidity and sunny days. Moreover, four treegrowth factors (tree height, canopy area, clear bole height and diameter at breast height) had significant influences on temperature reduction and relative humidity increase, and the general patterns were that larger trees usually accompany with higher regulating function. Our findings highlight that different forest types have dramatically different ecological service functions. For the landscape forests, we should continue to maintain its high ecological service function and strengthen the management of the forest types with low environmental regulation ability.

Key words: stable isotope, local meteoric water line, below-cloud evaporation effect, Northwest China, temporal and spatial distribution