欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

盐城围垦滩涂冬末大型土壤动物群落结构与多样性特征

葛宝明**,张代臻,唐伯平,张华彬,周春霖   

  1. (盐城师范学院江苏省滩涂生物资源与环境保护重点建设实验室, 江苏盐城 224051)
  • 出版日期:2013-12-10 发布日期:2013-12-10

Community structure and biodiversity of soil macrofauna in reclaimed coastal tidal flat in Yancheng of Jiangu, East China in late winter.

GE Bao-ming**, ZHANG Dai-zhen, TANG Bo-ping, ZHANG Hua-bin, ZHOU Chun-lin   

  1. (Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224051, Jiangsu, China)
  • Online:2013-12-10 Published:2013-12-10

摘要:

为了探究围垦滩涂不同土地利用方式下大型土壤动物群落组成和多样性特征,2012年3月选择江苏盐城沿海滩涂荒地、麦地、芦苇地、杨树林和水杉林5种生境类型(围垦30年左右),采用手拣法采集大型土壤动物。5种生境共采集土壤动物344只,隶属3门16目,其中优势类群是膜翅目、等足目和鳞翅目,分别占27.62%、16.60%和13.08%。研究时段大型土壤动物Shannon多样性指数(H’)和Margalef丰富度指数(R)均表现为杨树林>水杉林>荒地>麦地>芦苇地;方差分析显示,不同生境土壤动物个体数、类群数、Shannon多样性指数和Margalef丰富度指数上均有显著差异(P<0.001)。群落聚类结果显示,群落可分为4组:荒地、麦地、芦苇地和林地,其中荒地和林地群落之间距离较近,而麦地和芦苇地与其他生境的群落明显分离。非度量标度排序分析表明,围垦后滩涂大型土壤动物群落与土地利用方式密切相关,受土壤、植被和人为干扰等环境因素的影响。研究认为,在海岸带区域围垦滩涂采用提高生境复杂程度的土地利用方式有利于生物多样性维持。
 

Abstract: In March, 2012, an investigation with hand-sorted method was conducted on the soil macrofauna in five habitat types (virgin land, wheat field, bulrush land, poplar forest land, and metasequoia forest land) in a 30-year reclaimed coastal tidal flat in Yancheng of Jiangu, East China, aimed to approach the community composition and biodiversity of soil macrofauna in coastal tidal flat under effects of different land use types. Five quadrats (each with an area of 25 cm × 25 cm and a depth of 15 cm) were installed for each habitat. A total of 344 soil animals were collected, belonging to 16 orders and 3 phyla. The dominant groups were Hymenoptera (27.62%), Isopoda (16.60%), and Lepidoptera (13.08%). Both the Shannon biodiversity index (H’) and the Margalef richness index (R) of the soil macrofaunal communities showed a trend of poplar forest > metasequoia forest > virgin land > wheat field > bulrush land. Significant differences were observed in the abundance, taxa number, H’, and R of the soil macrofauna among the habitats (P<0.001). The cluster analysis showed that the soil macrofaunal communities could be classified as four groups, i.e., virgin land, wheat field, bulrush land, and forest land. The soil macrofaunal communities in the virgin land and forest land were more similar, but significantly different from those in wheat field and bulrush land. The clustering results were supported by the analysis of the minimum span tree with non-metric multi-dimensional scaling, showing that the biodiversity of the soil macrofaunal communities was affected by soil quality, vegetation characters, and human disturbances. It was considered that adopting the land use types with increased habitat complexity would benefit the maintenance of the biodiversity during the reclamation of coastal tidal flat.