欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (02): 477-482.

• 综述与专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

对旅游生态补偿内涵的思考

张一群1,2,杨桂华1**   

  1. 1云南大学工商管理与旅游管理学院, 昆明 650091; 2安徽农业大学经济管理学院, 合肥 230036
  • 出版日期:2012-02-08 发布日期:2012-02-08

On the connotation of tourism eco-compensation.

ZHANG Yi-qun1,2, YANG Gui-hua1**   

  1. 1College of Tourism and Business Management, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; 2 College of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
  • Online:2012-02-08 Published:2012-02-08

摘要: 鉴于旅游生态补偿基本认识上的混乱,本研究对旅游生态补偿的内涵进行了剖析。首先,基于旅游业与生态补偿之间关系的二重性,提出了认识旅游生态补偿的“主体说”与“途径说”2种视角;其次,通过基本语义与范畴的分析,明确了包含3类补偿主体和3类补偿对象(可归为自然与人2种类型),包含对负外部性行为的惩罚和对正外部性行为的激励两大方面,包含价值补偿和物质补偿2个层面的完整的旅游生态补偿关系域;最后,针对相关概念的混用,理清了“旅游资源生态补偿”、“旅游资源价值补偿”、“旅游征地补偿”与旅游生态补偿之间的关系。

关键词: 藏羚, 生境适宜性, 保护效率, 高寒荒漠区, 青藏高原

Abstract: In view of the confusion in the understanding of tourism eco-compensation, this paper made a tentative analysis on the connotation of tourism eco-compensation. Firstly, based on the dual relationship between tourism industry and ecological compensation, two perspectives on the cognition of tourism eco-compensation, i.e., ‘theory of subject’ and ‘theory of pathway’, were put forward. Secondly, after analyzing the basic semanteme and category of tourism eco-compensation, a complete relation domain wherein stakeholders would interact was clarified, which included tri-compensation subjects and tri-compensation objects (nature and human, respectively), punishment for negative externality and encouragement for positive externality, and value-oriented compensation and material-oriented compensation. Finally, aiming at the confused usage of related concepts, the relationships of “eco-compensation of tourism resources”, “value compensation of tourism resources”, and “compensation for occupied land of tourism” with tourism eco-compensation were made clearly.

Key words: Tibetan antelope, habitat suitability, conservation efficacy, alpine desert, QinghaiTibet Plateau.