欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

Cr(VI)污染细粒土壤化学淋洗修复效果与经济成本分析

王东辉1,李广辉1,2*,秦仕强1,蒋越3,陶伟光1,龚时慧1,王静1   

  1. 1招商局生态环保科技有限公司, 重庆 400067;2 重庆市土壤污染控制与修复工程技术研究中心, 重庆 400067; 3西南大学资源环境学院, 重庆 400715)
  • 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2021-01-09

Remediation effect of chemical leaching on Cr(VI) contaminated fine soil and its economiccost.

WANG Dong-hui1, LI Guang-hui1,2*, QIN Shi-qiang1, JIANG Yue3, TAO Wei-guang1, GONG Shi-hui1, WANG Jing1   

  1. (1China Merchants Ecological Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400067, China; 2Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Soil Contamination Control and Remediation, Chongqing 400067, China; 3College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China).
  • Online:2020-07-10 Published:2021-01-09

摘要: 土壤淋洗技术具有修复效率高、修复彻底、污染土壤减量化等特点,但目前土壤淋洗的药剂成本相对较高,且淋洗后的细粒土壤仍需固化、稳定化处理,限制了淋洗技术大规模的推广应用。本研究以重庆市某Cr(VI)污染场地细粒土壤为对象,探究了Cr(VI)污染细粒土壤化学淋洗修复的效果与经济可行性。结果表明:除EDTA外,随着草酸、柠檬酸、醋酸和盐酸浓度的增加,土壤中Cr(VI)的去除率均逐渐增加,且草酸和柠檬酸复配淋洗效果最佳;液固比5∶1~10∶1时淋洗效果和稳定性最佳,液固比大于10∶1或低于5∶1淋洗效果和稳定性降低。淋洗时间越长,土壤中Cr(VI)的去除效果越好,土壤中Cr(VI)的浸出浓度越低;以草酸和柠檬酸作为复配淋洗剂,在液固比5∶1,淋洗45 min情况下,土壤中Cr(VI)去除率为62.73%,Cr(VI)的浸出浓度为0.64 mg·L-1,低于垃圾填埋场Cr(VI)浸出标准1.5 mg·L-1,且Cr(VI)污染细粒土壤淋洗药剂成本为300元·t-1土,具备工程应用的经济可行性。

关键词: 唇鱼骨, 遗传多样性, COI基因, 间鱼骨, 中国南部, ND5基因, 遗传结构

Abstract: Chemical leaching is characterized by high efficiency, thorough rehabilitation, and reduction of contaminated soil. However, the cost of soil leaching is relatively high and the fine soil after chemical leaching needs to be solidified and stabilized, which limits the large-scale application of this technology. Cr(VI) contaminated fine soils were collected from Chongqing to explore the remediation effect and economic feasibility of chemical leaching. The results showed that, with increasing concentrations of oxalic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, and hydrochloric acid, the removal rate of Cr(VI) in soil increased gradually, with oxalic acid and citric acid having the best performance. The chemical leaching effect and stability were the best when the liquid-solid ratio was 5∶1-10∶1, which decreased when the liquidsolid ratio was greater than 10∶1 or lower than 5∶1. As processing time increased, the removal rate of Cr(VI) increased and the leaching concentration of Cr(VI) in soil decreased. Using oxalic acid and citric acid as mixed eluent, under the condition of liquidsolid ratio of 5∶1 and leaching for 45 min, the removal rate of Cr(VI) in soil was 62.73%, the leaching concentration of Cr(VI) was 0.64 mg·L-1, being lower than 1.5 mg·L-1 of the standard of Cr(VI) landfill. The cost of Cr(VI) contaminated fine soil leaching eluent was estimated as 300 CNY·t-1 soil, with economic feasibility for engineering application.

Key words: genetic structure, genetic diversity, South China., Hemibarbus medius, Hemibarbus labeo, COI gene, ND5 gene