欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 方法与技术 • 上一篇    

基于气候指数的安徽省茶叶气候品质评价

刘瑞娜1,陈金华1*,曹雯1,杨太明1,孙秀邦2,岳伟1,何令星3   

  1. 1安徽省农业气象中心/安徽省农业生态大数据工程实验室, 合肥 230031;2宣城市气象局, 安徽宣城 242000;3祁门县气象局, 安徽祁门 245600)
  • 出版日期:2019-02-10 发布日期:2019-02-10

Evaluation of tea climate quality based on climate index in Anhui Province.

LIU Rui-na1, CHEN Jin-hua1*, CAO Wen1, YANG Tai-ming1, SUN Xiu-bang2, YUE Wei1, HE Lin-xing3   

  1. (1Anhui Agricultural Meteorological Center/Anhui Engineering Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Big Data, Hefei 230031, China; 2Xuancheng Meteorological Bureau, Xuancheng 242000, Anhui, China; 3Qimen Meteorological Bureau, Qimen 245600, Anhui, China).
  • Online:2019-02-10 Published:2019-02-10

摘要: 基于安徽省茶叶主产区2010—2015年22个气象站逐日气象资料、茶树生育期观测资料和已有的茶叶生理气候阈值,提出了由茶叶品质温度指数、相对湿度指数和日照指数构成的综合气候指数(IC)。应用K均值聚类分析方法,确定了茶叶气候品质评价等级标准,应用泾县田间试验获取的汀溪兰香茶叶品质数据对评价等级进行验证,并开展了安徽省2015年茶叶气候品质等级量化评价。结果表明:茶叶气候品质评价等级划分为1级(IC≥0.90)、2级(0.75≤IC<0.90)、3级(0.50≤IC<0.75)和4级(IC<0.50)共4个等级。试验数据检验表明,茶叶气候品质评价等级与茶叶生产实际基本一致;2015年早春茶和春茶气候品质等级为1级,晚春茶气候品质等级为2级,个别站点为3级,夏茶气候品质等级为3级,秋茶气候品质等级为2~3级。研究成果可为优化安徽省茶叶生产布局提供科学依据。

关键词: 基塘模式, 农业生态工程, 能值, 可持续发展能力

Abstract: Based on daily meteorological data and tea growth data of 22 observation stations in Anhui Province from 2010 to 2015 as well as physiological threshold value of tea, we proposed an integrated climate index consisting of temperature index, relative humidity index and sunshine index that affect tea quality. The grade criteria of climate quality of tea were established by Kmeans clustering analysis and verified using chemical indices of Tingxi Lanxiang tea in Jingxian County in 2015. The climate quality of tea was estimated in Anhui Province in 2015 using the grade criteria. Results showed that the grade criteria of tea climate quality could be defined as level 1, level 2, level 3 and level 4 when the climate index was more than 0.90, between 0.75-0.90, between 0.50-0.75, and less than 0.50 respectively. The testing results indicated that the evaluated levels of tea climate quality were consistent with the actual tea quality. The climate quality of earlyspring tea and spring tea was at level 1, the climate quality of latespring tea was at level 2, and some individual sites were at level 3. The climate quality of summer tea was at level 3 and the climate quality of autumn tea was at level 2 or 3. Our results could provide scientific support for optimizing the layout of featured tea production in Anhui.

Key words: Dike-pond modes, Agro-ecological engineering, Energy value, Sustainable development ability