欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 方法与技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于B-IBI评价淮河流域(河南段)河流生态健康

栗晓燕1,2,于鲁冀1,2*,吕晓燕2,徐艳红2,郝子垚1   

  1. (1郑州大学水利与环境学院, 郑州 450002; 2郑州大学环境技术咨询工程有限公司, 郑州 450002)
  • 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-07-10

Health assessment of aquatic ecosystem in Huai River Basin (Henan section) based on B-IBI.

LI Xiao-yan1,2, YU Lu-ji1,2*, LÜ Xiao-yan2, XU Yan-hong2, HAO Zi-yao1   

  1. (1College of Water Conservancy and Environmental Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2Zhengzhou University Environmental Technology and Consultancy Company, Ltd., Zhengzhou 450002, China).
  • Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-07-10

摘要: 依据2015年4—5月淮河流域(河南段)的67个底栖动物调研点位(13个参照点和54个受损点)数据,对20个候选生物学指数值的分布范围、相关关系和判别能力进行分析,从中筛选出总分类单元数、敏感类群比例、生物指数、端足目+软体动物物种数、端足目+软体动物%、最优势类群相对丰度构成淮河流域(河南段)的底栖动物完整性指数(BIBI)指标体系。分别用3分制、4分制以及比值法统一各参数量纲,并比较3种方法的评价结果准确性。结果表明:采用4分制统一各参数量纲并依据所有样点的BIBI值分布的95%分位数法建立的健康评价标准优于3分制法和比值法;建立了适合淮河流域(河南段)河流生态系统的健康评价标准:B-IBI值>24,健康;18~24,亚健康;12~18,一般;6~12,差;≤6,极差。评价结果表明:淮河流域(河南段)67个样点中,“健康”的点位占比19.40%;“亚健康”的点位占比26.87%;“一般”的点位占比32.84%;“差”的点位占比10.45%;“极差”的点位占比10.45%,淮河流域(河南段)整体BIBI与氧化还原电位呈极显著正相关,与NH4+-N呈显著负相关,其余水质指标与BIBI无显著相关关系。BIBI与各水质指标之间的相关性在不同的河流上差异较大。

关键词: 刺槐, 辽东栎, 土壤含水量, 时滞, 径级, 树干液流

Abstract: Based on the data collected from 67 zoobenthos sampling sites (13 reference sites and 54 impaired sites) in the Huai River Basin (Henan section) from April to May of 2015, we analyzed twenty candidate biological index values for distribution range, correlations and discriminability, and screened out total number of taxa, proportion of sensitive groups, biotic index, number of amphipods and mollusks, percentage of amphipods and mollusks, and percentage of dominant species to form a B-IBI index system for the Huai River Basin (Henan section). Methods of 3-score system, 4-score system, and ratio technique were separately used to uniformize dimensions of various parameters. We compared the accuracy of the three methods for their function in evaluation. Results showed that the health evaluation criteria established on the B-IBI values of all the sampling sites and dimensions of various parameters uniformized with the 4score system were superior to that based on the ratio method and 3score system. A health assessment standard of river ecosystem suitable for the Huai River Basin (Henan section) was established based on the calculated B-IBI value: >24, healthy; 18-24, sub-healthy; 12-18, fair; 6-12, poor; ≤6, extremely poor. 19.40% of the total 67 sampling sites were in healthy state, 26.87% in sub-healthy state, 32.84% in fair state, 10.45% in poor state, and 10.45% in extremely poor state. In Huai River Basin (Henan section), the B-IBI was significantly positively correlated with the redox potential, and negatively correlated with NH4+-N. There was no significant correlationbetween the other water quality indicators and B-IBI. The correlation between B-IBI and water quality indices varied greatly among different rivers.

Key words: time lag, sap flow, diameter class, Robinia pseudoacacia, Quercus liaotungensis, soil water content