欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同密度下拟南芥的亲缘选择

李洁1,2,王静3,徐兴良1,梁涛1,2*#br#   

  1. (1中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100010; 2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3国家林业局西北林业调查规划设计院, 西安 710048)
  • 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2016-12-10

Kin selection of Arabidopsis thaliana under different densities.

LI Jie1,2,3, WANG Jing3, XU Xing-liang1, LIANG Tao1,2*#br#   

  1. (1Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulating Institute of Geographic Sciences and Nature Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100010, China; 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3Northwest Institute of Forest Inventory, Planning and Design, State Forestry Administration, Xi’an 710048, China).
  • Online:2016-12-10 Published:2016-12-10

摘要:

亲缘选择理论认为亲缘个体之间通过亲缘认知而相互合作以增加其适合度。前期的相关研究证实了一些植物物种之间具有亲缘选择作用,而且不同物种对亲缘选择的响应方式各有差异。但是,现有的试验物种较少,且未考虑其他环境因子的影响。为了验证拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana)不同生态型对亲缘选择的响应方式,本试验选取3个拟南芥生态型\[Columbia (Col)、Landsbergerecta (Ler)和Wassileskijia (Ws)\]作为研究对象,在3种密度条件下,通过测度植物表型特征(株高、莲座面积、叶面积和种子数等)和各构件生物量特征(根、茎、叶和种子生物量)在亲缘处理组和非亲缘组的差异,来探索密度对亲缘选择结果的影响。结果表明,拟南芥各生态型亲缘组与非亲缘组差异主要表现在地上部分,而地下部分在亲缘和非亲缘组并没有显著差异;3种生态型拟南芥对亲缘选择的响应方式不同,Col主要表现在种子生物量上,Ler主要表现在叶和茎生物量上,Ws主要表现在种子和茎生物量上;拟南芥不同生态型对亲缘选择的响应方式依赖于种植密度,密度是影响拟南芥亲缘选择表现的重要因素。
 

关键词: 淮河流域, 影响因子, 实际蒸散, 遥感-过程耦合模型

Abstract: Kin selection theory predicts that kin individuals could cooperate to increase their fitness through kin recognition. Previous studies confirmed that kin selection occurred in some plant species, and kin responses differed among species. However, the tested species were still seldom, and the influences of environmental factors were not considered. In order to verify kin selection in different ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana, our study selected three Arabidopsis ecotypes of Columbia (Col), Landsbergerecta (Ler) and Wassileskijia (Ws) as the research objects, to explore the influence of density on kin selection through measuring differences in plant phenotypic traits (plant height, rosette area, leaf area and seed number, etc.) and biomass (root, stem, leaf and seed biomass) between kin groups and nokin groups under three simulated densities. Our study showed significant differences in aboveground traits, but no differences in root distribution between kin and stranger groups of each ecotype. Kin response differed among the three ecotypes: Col and Ws ecotypes mainly responded to kin recognition in reproduction tissue (seeds), while Ler mainly in vegetable tissues (leaf and stem). Which phenotypic and biomass traits and how the traits of same ecotypes responded to kin recognition mainly relied on planting density, suggesting that density was an important factor in plant kin selection.

Key words: influencing factor., evapotranspiration, Huaihe Basin, Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS)