苗期涝渍对黄淮地区夏玉米生长和产量的影响

生态学杂志

苗期涝渍对黄淮地区夏玉米生长和产量的影响

余卫东^1,2,冯利平²,胡程达¹,彭记永^1

（¹中国气象局/河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点实验室，郑州 450003； ^2中国农业大学资源与环境学院，北京 100193）

出版日期:2015-08-10 发布日期:2015-08-10

Effects of waterlogging during seedling stage on the growth and yield of summer maize in HuangHuai Region.

YU Wei-dong^1,2, FENG Li-ping², HU Cheng-da¹, PENG Ji-yong^1

(¹Key Laboratory of Agrometeorological Ensuring and Applied Technique, China Meteorological Administration/Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450003, China; ²College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Online:2015-08-10 Published:2015-08-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以玉米品种“浚单20”为试验材料，采用盆栽方式，在4叶期分别设置持续淹水（3、5和7 d）和持续渍水（5、10和15 d）处理，研究苗期涝渍对夏玉米生长及产量的影响。结果表明：苗期连续淹水3 d以上或渍水15 d的产量显著降低；与对照相比，淹水3～7 d，产量下降58.8%～69.8%（P<0.05）；渍水15 d，产量下降47.8%（P<0.05）；淹水3～5 d以及渍水15 d导致产量下降的主要原因是穗粒数减少，而淹水7 d减产是穗粒数减少和千粒重下降共同作用的结果；产量相对损失率与淹水天数的回归分析表明苗期淹水应控制在1 d以内；涝渍胁迫显著降低了地上部分干物质质量，其后续影响与胁迫方式、涝渍天数和生育期有关；淹水显著降低了拔节期及以后各生育期的地上干物质质量（P<0.05），而渍水对成熟期干物质重影响不显著（P>0.05）；淹水处理可显著降低穗部占地上部分干物质的比例，淹水3～7 d，收获指数下降48.7%～64.1%（P<0.05）。由此可判断，玉米产量随涝渍时间的延长而减少，且淹水胁迫对产量的影响大于渍水。

关键词: -萘乙酸, 开花期, &alpha, 碳代谢, 干旱, 大豆

Abstract: In this study, a pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of waterlogging during the seedling stage on the growth and grain yield of summer maize. Different treatments of surface waterlogging (for 3, 5 or 7 d) and subsurface waterlogging (for 5, 10 or 15 d) were included during the 4-leaf stage of summer maize cultivar Xundan No. 20. The results showed that surface waterlogging at the seedling stage for 3 d or more and subsurface waterlogging for 15 d decreased the grain yield significantly. Compared with the CK, surface waterlogging for 3-7 d decreased maize yield by 58.8%-69.8% (P<0.05), while subsurface waterlogging for 15 d decreased maize yield by 47.8% (P<0.05). Yield reduction resulted from surface waterlogging for 3-5 d or subsurface waterlogging for 15 d was mainly due to the decline in grain number per spike, while surface waterlogging for 7 d would lead to the reduction in yield by decreasing the grain number per spike and the 1000seed weight. Regression analysis of the yield loss rates and the surface waterlogging durations indicated that effective measures should be taken to control waterlogging within 1 d at the seedling stage. The effect of waterlogging on the aboveground dry matter weight of maize varied with the type and duration of waterlogging at different developmental stages. The aboveground dry matter weight after the jointing stage was significantly reduced due to surface waterlogging (P<0.05), while subsurface waterlogging did not affect significantly the aboveground dry matter weight at the maturity stage (P>0.05). Surface waterlogging for 3-7 d also affected the distribution of aboveground dry matter weight, reducing the proportion of dry matter in corncob and the harvest index by 48.7%-64.1% (P<0.05). The results indicated that the yield loss rate increased with the prolongation of waterlogging duration and the yield loss rate due to surface waterlogging was greater than that due to subsurface waterlogging.

Key words: drought stress, soybean, carbon metabolism., flowering stage, α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)

余卫东1,2,冯利平2,胡程达1,彭记永1. 苗期涝渍对黄淮地区夏玉米生长和产量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志.

YU Wei-dong1,2, FENG Li-ping2, HU Cheng-da1, PENG Ji-yong1. Effects of waterlogging during seedling stage on the growth and yield of summer maize in HuangHuai Region.[J]. cje.

[1]	王雲霞, 单立山, 解婷婷, 马静, 师亚婷. 干旱-复水对红砂幼苗各器官非结构性碳水化合物的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 383-394.
[2]	闫明, 刘晓宇, 刘志萍, 刘青青, 奚为民. 特大干旱后美国德克萨斯州东部国家森林碳动态及其驱动因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 395-406.
[3]	邓秀秀, 施征, 曾立雄, 雷蕾, 裴顺祥, 吴莎, 肖文发. 干旱和遮荫对马尾松幼苗瞬时水分利用效率及δ¹³C的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 140-145.
[4]	邢媛, 李凯峰, 周进华, 郭华春, 李俊. 不同马铃薯品种（系）耐旱性综合评价及其指标筛选 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 178-187.
[5]	陈玉, 贾剑波, 颜成正, 胡育文, 任鑫磊, 王一帆, 吴小红. 干旱胁迫下杉木叶片吸水及水分逆向运移特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2091-2099.
[6]	徐刚, 陈忠平, 俞霞, 肖世豪, 蔡如深, 潘语卓, 鲁美娟, 杨文亭. 甜玉米-大豆间作和施氮对红壤旱地田间杂草群落的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 1880-1889.
[7]	任义方, 张蕾, 李玉涛, 零丰华. 江苏冬小麦生育阶段干旱时空分布特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 1890-1901.
[8]	盛伟, 吴欣池, 李慈云, 马艳艳, 梁浩, 张靖雪, 丁西朋, 刘国道, 李欣勇. 41份木豆萌发期抗旱性综合评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(7): 1627-1634.
[9]	赵杏花, 张格, 韩彦隆, 郭璐, 何玉婷, 高永. 唐古特白刺枝叶形态结构对水分条件的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(6): 1290-1298.
[10]	李云霞, 王晨旭, 刘焱序. 基于生态系统服务簇分区的土地利用多目标优化——以巴彦淖尔市为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1205-1213.
[11]	彭兰, 周晓兵, 陶冶, 尹本丰, 李永刚, 张静, 张元明. 干旱对梭梭水力性状及生理生化特性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 257-265.
[12]	常道琴, 宋乃平, 岳健敏, 孟晨. 干旱区重金属污染尾矿土MICP注浆修复效果 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(12): 2864-2873.
[13]	董彦君, 李宗善, 陈颖, 高光耀, 王聪, 王晓春. 黄耆属草本植物根部导管结构对环境因子的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(12): 2936-2943.
[14]	钟行杰, 张明聪, 韩爱平, 秦彬, 丁哲鹏, 张玉先. 外源褪黑素对苏打盐碱胁迫大豆幼苗的缓解效应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(12): 2953-2960.
[15]	陈俊芳, 吴宪, 杨佳绒, 刘啸林, 刘宇. 全球气候变化下干旱及复水对植物和土壤微生物的影响：进展与展望 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(12): 3038-3049.