欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 方法与技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于日照时数的光合有效辐射(PAR)时数估算方法

张广奇1,2,3,朱教君1,2**,李荣平4,李秀芬5   

  1. (1森林与土壤生态国家重点实验室, 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110164; 2中国科学院清原森林生态系统观测研究站, 沈阳 110016; 3中国科学院大学, 北京 100049; 4辽宁省气象科学研究所, 沈阳 110166; 5沈阳农业大学, 沈阳 110866)
  • 出版日期:2015-12-10 发布日期:2015-12-10

Estimation of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) using sunshine duration.

ZHANG Guang-qi1,2,3, ZHU Jiao-jun1,2**, LI Rong-ping4, LI Xiu-fen5   

  1. (1State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110164, China; 2Qingyuan Forest CERN, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China; 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4Institute of Meteorological Research, Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110166, China; 5Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)
  • Online:2015-12-10 Published:2015-12-10

摘要:

光合有效辐射(PAR)是影响光合生产潜力的重要因素,传统气候学计算PAR值的方法所需参数较多,且对天气变化敏感、精度较差。为此,基于容易获得的实际监测日照时数与理论计算日照时数比值,提出了一种估算PAR强度超过一定阈值(最低值>300 μmol·m-2·s-1)时间长度的方法,与日照时数对应,定义为PAR时数。将PAR时数估算值与7年间超过不同光照阈值(27、36、100、200、300、360、450和900 μmol·m-2·s-1)的PAR时数实测值进行对比,分析了监测时间长度、季节、天气情况对PAR时数估算精度的影响。结果表明:PAR值>300 μmol·m-2·s-1、监测时间≥4年,PAR时数估算值与实测值无显著差异;监测时间越长,PAR时数估算精度越高。虽然秋季与春季估算精度好于夏季;晴天与多云天气估算精度好于阴天,但鉴于长期、全生长季的结果更能反映真实情况,因此,本研究建议采用生长季长期监测的方法(监测时间至少为4年)利用日照时数估算>300 μmol·m-2·s-1以上的PAR时数。
 

关键词: 生长, 林窗大小, 南方红豆杉, 形质, 杉木

Abstract: Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is an important factor indicating the photosynthetic productive potential. Traditional PAR estimation methods, however, need much more climatic parameters, and are sensitive to weather conditions and low in accuracy. Thus, we provided a new method to estimate PAR duration, which is defined as the duration when PAR exceeds a certain value, e.g., 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 in a day of the growing season, using the ratios of observed sunshine duration (the most common index in each meteorological station) to theoretical sunshine duration. We monitored both sunshine duration and PAR duration for 7 years. The paired values of observed and estimated PAR durations based on different thresholds (27, 36, 100, 200, 300, 360, 450 and 900 μmol·m-2·s-1) were collected. The effects of monitoring time length, seasons and weather conditions on the accuracy of estimated PAR duration were analyzed. There were no significant differences between estimated PAR durations (mean values) and the observed values (P>0.05) when the monitoring time length was equal or greater than 4 years for PAR>300 μmol·m-2·s-1. The accuracy of the estimated PAR duration was higher when the monitoring time length became longer; it was lower in summer than in spring and autumn, and lower in cloudy sky than in sunny and fair weather. We recommended the use of longterm (at least 4 years) observations of sunshine duration to estimate the duration of PAR >300 μmol·m-2·s-1 because the overall effects of the weather conditions in whole growing season can be reflected by the long term observations.

Key words: growth, Taxus wallichina var. mairei, form quality, Cunninghamia lanceolata, gap size