欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 •    下一篇

高寒矮嵩草草甸物种多样性与功能多样性对初级生产力的影响

臧岳铭1;朱志红1;李英年2;王文娟1;席博1   

  1. 1陕西师范大学生命科学学院, 西安 710062;2中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 西宁 810008
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-22 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-06-10 发布日期:2009-06-10

Effects of species diversity and functional diversity on primary productivity of alpine meadow.

ZANG Yue-ming1;ZHU Zhi-hong1;LI Ying-nian2;WANG Wen-juan1;XI Bo1   

  1. 1College of Life Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China;2Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China
  • Received:2008-09-22 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-06-10 Published:2009-06-10

摘要: 自然生态系统中植物物种多样性是否随功能多样性变化而影响初级生产力的问题存在很大争议。在高寒矮嵩草草甸,对不同放牧强度、不同利用格局和土壤资源水平的4种生境(Ⅰ.畜圈:重度放牧、资源丰富;Ⅱ.牧道:中度放牧、资源适中;Ⅲ.人工草地:轻-中度放牧、资源贫乏;Ⅳ.封育草地:不放牧、资源贫乏)中物种多样性与功能多样性的变化及其对初级生产力的影响进行了研究。结果表明:物种多样性在牧道生境最高,符合中度干扰理论的预测;人工草地物种多样性低但功能多样性却最高;封育草地物种多样性和功能多样性均较高;物种多样性与地上生物量呈正相关,而功能多样性则与地上生物量呈负相关。表明功能多样性不随物种多样性而变化,二者可能在一定程度上是相互独立地作用于生产力的。群落生产力和生物多样性受生境资源、物种特征、放牧历史和放牧强度等因素的综合影响。

关键词: 湖泊, 生态系统动力学, 模型

Abstract: Whether the species diversity (SD) in natural ecosystem varies wit h functional diversity (FD) and consequently affects the primary productivit y is still an open question. In this paper, a field grazing experiment was condu cted on an alpine Kobresia humilis meadow to study the effects of SD and FD on t he primary productivity of the ecosystem. Four habitats with different grazing i ntensity and soil nutrient availability were selected, i.e., pen pasture with he avy grazing intensity and highest nutrient availability, pass pasture with moder ate grazing intensity and moderate nutrient availability, artificial pasture wit h light-moderate grazing intensity and lower nutrient availability, and un-gra zed pasture with null grazing intensity and lowest nutrient availability. Among the test habitats, pass pasture had the highest SD, which fitted intermediat e disturbance hypothesis. Artificial pasture had low SD but the highest FD , while un-grazed pasture had higher SD and FD. There was a positive relationship between SD and primary productivity but a negative relationship between FD and primary productivity, suggesting that FD didn’t vary wi th SD, and, to a definite extent, both SD and FD could affect the pr imary productivity independently. Habitat resources, species charact eristics, grazing history, and grazing intensity affected the community’s prima ry productivity and biodiversity in an integrative way.

Key words: Lake, Ecosystem dynamics, Modeling