欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 学术讨论与建议 • 上一篇    

“生态环境”一词的合理性与科学性辨析

张林波1,2;舒俭民2;王维2;安达2   

  1. 1中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;2中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-10 修回日期:2006-06-03 出版日期:2006-10-10 发布日期:2006-10-10

Analysis on the rationality and scientificity of “ecological environment”

ZHANG Linbo1,2; SHU Jianmin2; WANG Wei2; AN Da2   

  1. 1Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101, China;2Chinese Research Academy of Environment Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
  • Received:2006-01-10 Revised:2006-06-03 Online:2006-10-10 Published:2006-10-10

摘要: “生态环境”一词是比较中国化的、在中国使用频率较高的一个词。目前中国生态学界和环境科学界开展了一场关于“生态环境”一词合理性和科学性的热烈讨论。本文在文献综述的基础上,系统总结了有关“生态环境”一词的争论与观点,从“生态”和“环境”两词概念含义、学科发展、语义发展等方面探讨了“生态环境”一词的合理性与科学性,分析了在这场争论和讨论中的一些错误认识。

Abstract: “Ecological environment” is a Chinese style term, and has been widely used in Chinese publications. Recently, a warm academic argument is being launched for whether the term is scientific or not. Based on literature review, this paper summarized the positive and negative viewpoints of the argument, and from the aspects of the concepts of “ecology” and “environment”, discipline develop-ment, and philologic development, analyzed the rationality and scientificity of “ecological environment”, and some misunderstandings in the argument.

Key words: Clethrionomys rufocanus, Activity rhythm