水淹对互花米草生长及生理的影响

生态学杂志 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (9): 1025-1028.

水淹对互花米草生长及生理的影响

肖强, 郑海雷, 叶文景, 陈瑶, 朱珠

厦门大学生命科学学院, 厦门, 361005

收稿日期:2004-10-26 修回日期:2004-11-23 出版日期:2005-09-10
通讯作者: 郑海雷
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金项目(D0210001);国家自然科学基金资助项目(30271065,39970438,39870630)

Effects of waterlogging on growth and physiology of Spartina alterniflora

XIAO Qiang, ZHENG Hailei, YE Wenjing, CHEN Yao, ZHU Zhu

School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Received:2004-10-26 Revised:2004-11-23 Online:2005-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了互花米草在不同没顶水淹时间处理下,株高、叶面积等生长指标以及叶片光合速率与色素、脯氨酸、可溶性糖和蛋白质含量等生理指标变化情况。结果表明,随着水淹时间延长,米草株高和叶面积呈下降趋势,叶片光合速率下降;叶片中自由水/束缚水、叶绿素和类胡萝卜素含量、可溶性糖在不同水淹时长处理之间也存在显著差异;但可溶性蛋白质和游离脯氨酸含量在各处理间差异无显著性。

关键词: 人工植被, TWINSPAN分类, DCA排序, DCCA排序, 安太堡矿区, 恢复生态学

Abstract: In this paper,the variations of plant height,leaf area,leaf photosynthetic rate,photosynthetic pigment,praline,soluble sugar and protein content for Spartina alterniflora seedlings related to various waterlogging time length were investigated.The results showed that the height and leaf area tended to decrease with the increaseing waterlogging duration.Leaf photosynthetic rate decreased significantly with increaseing waterlogging.There were significant differences between various waterlogging time and the ratio of free water to bound water,photosynthetic pigment,and soluble sugar content.Content of protein and proline tended to remain stable.

Key words: Artificial vegetation, TWINSPAN classification, DCA ordination, DCCA ordination, Antaibao mining area, Restoration ecology

中图分类号:

Q945

肖强, 郑海雷, 叶文景, 陈瑶, 朱珠. 水淹对互花米草生长及生理的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, (9): 1025-1028.

XIAO Qiang, ZHENG Hailei, YE Wenjing, CHEN Yao, ZHU Zhu. Effects of waterlogging on growth and physiology of Spartina alterniflora[J]. cje, 2005, (9): 1025-1028.

参考文献

[1] 利容千,王建波.2002.植物逆境细胞及生理学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社.
[2] 张志良,瞿伟菁.2003.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
[3] 张殿忠,汪沛洪,赵会贤.1990.测定小麦叶片游离脯氨酸含量的方法[J].植物生理学通讯,(4):62～65.
[4] 李玉昌,李阳生,李绍清.1998.淹涝胁迫对水稻生长发育与耐淹性机理研究的进展[J].中国水稻科学,12(增刊):70～76.
[5] 李合生.2000.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
[6] 李阳生,李绍清.2000.淹涝胁迫对水稻生育后期的生理特性和产量性状的影响[J].武汉植物学研究,18(2):117～122.
[7] 周春霜,安树青.2002.海滨盐土农业生态工程[M].北京:化学工业出版社.
[8] 林如求.1997.三都湾大米草和互花米草的危害及治理研究[J].福建地理,12(1):16～19.
[9] 钦佩,仲崇信.1992.米草的应用研究[M].北京:海洋出版社.
[10] Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenol oxidase Beta vulgaris [J]. Plant Physiol., 24:1 ～15.
[11] Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding[J]. Anal. Biochem., 72:248～ 254.
[12] Delaune RD, Smith CJ, Patrick WH. 1983. Relationship of marsh elevation, redox potential and sulfide to Spartina alterniflora productivity[J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer . J . , 47: 930～ 935.
[13] Hester MW, Mendelssohn IA, Mckee KL. 2001. Species and population variation to salinity stress in Panicum hemitomon,Spartina patens, and Spartina alterniflora morphological and physiological constraints [J]. Environ. Exp. Bot., 46: 277 ～297.
[14] King GM, Klug MJ. 1982. Relation of soil water movement and sulfide concentration to Spartina alterniflora production in a Georgia salt marsh [J]. Science, 218: 61 ～ 63.
[15] Linthurst RA. 1979. The effect of aeration on the growth of Spartina alterniflora Loisel[J]. Amer. J. Bot., 66:685 ～691.
[16] Smart RM, Barko JW. 1980. Nitrogen nutrition and salinity tolerance of Distichlis spicata and Spartina alterni flora [J]. Ecology,61:630～638.