SPF鸡与普通鸡消化道主要正常菌群数量的比较

生态学杂志 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (7): 795-798.

SPF鸡与普通鸡消化道主要正常菌群数量的比较

柳洪洁¹, 成连贵², 牛钟相¹, 王建昌¹, 宁海强¹

1. 山东农业大学动物科技学院, 泰安, 271018;
2. 滨州职业学院生物工程系, 滨州, 256624

收稿日期:2004-11-04 修回日期:2005-01-10 出版日期:2005-07-10
通讯作者: 牛钟相
基金资助:
山东省财政支持资助项目(SDGP2004-54-O).

Comparison of the quantity of normal flora in digestive tracks betweeol SPF and ordinary chicken

LIU Hongjie¹, CHENG Liangui², NIU Zhongxiang¹, WANG Jianchang¹, NING Haiqiang ¹

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Shangdong Agricultural University, Tai′an 271018, China;
2. Department of Bioenginecring, Binzhou Vocational College, Binzhou 256624, China

Received:2004-11-04 Revised:2005-01-10 Online:2005-07-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用微生态学方法,对SPF鸡和普通鸡嗉囔、腺胃、回肠、盲肠和直肠5个部位的梭杆菌、真杆菌、消化球菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸杆菌、类杆菌、肠球菌、葡萄球菌和肠杆菌等9种主要正常菌群进行定性、定量分析.结果表明,SPF鸡嗉囔中真杆菌、梭杆菌、双歧杆菌、类杆菌、葡萄球菌和肠杆菌数高于普通鸡,其中真杆菌、梭杆菌、葡萄球菌和肠杆菌数差异极显著(P<0.01);腺胃中梭杆菌、真杆菌、消化球菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸杆菌、类杆菌和肠杆菌数高于普通鸡,其中真杆菌数差异显著(P<0.05);回肠中真杆菌、双歧杆菌、类杆菌、葡萄球菌和肠杆菌数高于普通鸡,其中类杆菌数差异极显著(P<0.01);盲肠中梭杆菌、消化球菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸杆菌和肠球菌数低于普通鸡,其中乳酸杆菌数差异显著(P<0.05);直肠中各菌数量都低于普通鸡,其中双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌差异显著(P<0.05).

关键词: 生姜, 南方根结线虫, 接种密度, 产量

Abstract: Qualitative and quantitive investigations wasere carried out on the intestinal bacterial community in SPF and ordinary chicken.Nine kinds of dominant intestinal bacteria were selected and counted on various selective media.The results showed that when comparing SPF with ordinary chicken,significant differences were found in the number of clostridium,eubacterium,staphylococcus and escherichia coli in crop (P<0.01),staphylococcus(P<0.05) in proventriculus,bacteroides (P<0.01) in ileum,lactobacillus (P<0.05) in caecum,and bifidobacterium and lactobacillus (P<0.05) in rectum.

Key words: Ginger, Meloidogyne incognita, Inoculation density, Yield

中图分类号:

Q938.1

柳洪洁, 成连贵, 牛钟相, 王建昌, 宁海强. SPF鸡与普通鸡消化道主要正常菌群数量的比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, (7): 795-798.

LIU Hongjie, CHENG Liangui, NIU Zhongxiang, WANG Jianchang, NING Haiqiang . Comparison of the quantity of normal flora in digestive tracks betweeol SPF and ordinary chicken[J]. cje, 2005, (7): 795-798.

参考文献

[1] 李影林.1991.培养基手册[M].吉林:吉林科学技术出版社.
[2] 吴仲文,李兰娟,马伟杭,等.2000.肠道微生物定植抗力的新指标--B/E值[J].浙江预防医学,12(7):4～5.
[3] 何昭阳,王增辉,吴延春,等.2000.雏鸡消化道主要正常菌群定植规律的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,31(1):41～48.
[4] 杨景云.1997.医用微生态学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社.
[5] 杨洁彬,郭兴华.1996.乳酸菌--生物学基础及应用[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社.
[6] 郭兴华.2002.益生菌基础与应用[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社.
[7] 熊德鑫.1986.厌氧菌分离和鉴定方法[M].南昌:江西科学技术出版社.
[8] 光冈知足.1970.肠道菌の世界[M].东京:东京从文社.
[9] Apajalahti JHA, Sarkilahti LK, Maki BRE, et al. 1998. Effective recovery of bacterial DNA and percent-guanine-plus- cytosinebased analysis of community structure in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens [J]. Appl. Environ. Microb., 64: 4084 ～4088.
[10] Arthur O, Erika I, Seppo S. 2002. The role of the intestinal microflora for the development of the immune system in early childhood [J]. Europ .J. Nutri., 41(32) :37.
[11] Authur H, Beame B, Summers M, et al. 1990. Biological Control of Salmonella Typhimurium in Young Chickens[J]. Avian diseases, 3626 ～ 3633.
[12] Mead GC. 1997. Bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of birds [J].Gastrointestinal Microb., 54(13): 216～ 240.
[13] Van der Waai JD, Berghuis JM, Lekkerkerk-Van der Wees JEC.1971. Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice[J]. J. Hyg., 69: 405.
[14] Van der Wielen PWJJ, Keuzenkamp DA, Lipman LJA, et al.2002. Spatial and temporal variation of the intestinal bacterial community in commercially raised broiler chickens during growth[J]. Microb. Ecol., 44:286～293.
[15] Wierup M, Hopfer RJ. 1988. Epidemiological evaluation of the salmonella controlling effect of a nation wide use of a competitive exclusion culture in poultry [J]. Poult. Sci., 67:1026～1033.